Wednesday, February 6, 2008

I have heard so many warnings of the peril of "Islamo-fascism" and the threat it poses to Western Civilization, that I have decided to undertake a comparative study of both conservative Christians and their Islamist foes. Here are my findings.


Differences between an “Islamo-fascist” and a fundamentalist Christian

Islamo-fascists believe that they are acting according to the will of God based on the revelation contained in their holy book, which was divinely inspired. They maintain that, when in conflict, empirical evidence and logic must be subordinated to their interpretation of this work. Fundamentalist Christians, on the other hand, are centered predominantly in the U.S.

Islamo-fascists believe that those who disagree with them are going to hell, and are not merely honest proponents of another opinion, but are enemies of the faith and agents of the devil. Fundamentalist Christians enjoy football.

Islamo-fascists believe that their nations should be ruled by the law of Allah, and it is their duty to take back the government for their Lord, and reflect the moral teaching of their religion with their governance. Fundamentalist Christians eat pork.

Islamo-fascists repress their women, and teach that their proper place is the home, away from the corrupting influence of the public sphere, politics and education. Fundamentalist Christians allow their women to repress themselves.

Islamo-fascists are obsessed with sex, virginity and purity, and impose this highly unhealthy fixation on others. This leads to all sorts of hypocrisy, such as temporary marriages. Fundamentalist Christians have high speed internet.


No wonder these people hate each other so much